Persona runs AI-moderated customer interviews, replacing six-week agency studies with a few days of real conversations. Their problem was not the product. It was that nobody could tell, from a list, who had a research question worth answering this week.
- Industry
- Consumer and product research
- Stage
- Seed, founder-led, selling to heads of insights, growth and product
- Engagement
- 2026
- What we built
- Sending infrastructure, 27 campaigns, a study topic drafted for every brand, and a repeatable approach to event outreach
- Impact
- 111 sales conversations in 20 weeks
Their buyers were not cold. They were hidden.
The hard part was never the pitch - it was earning the chance to make it, at scale. Persona already had customers including WPP, Miro, Exponent, Otter, Jupiter and Biossance. To reach more, the founders sent hundreds of cold emails and received just a few replies. Their lists relied on industry, headcount and funding stage. None of that says whether a research question is sitting on someone's desk this week.
The buyers existed - brands betting their next product line on guesswork because nobody had talked to a customer in months. That is exactly the problem Persona solves, and no database column says who has it. The job was never a bigger list. It was finding the brands living the problem right now.
Three chapters, one lesson.
This is what “broad” looked like in practice. Six roles, each with its own opening question - and no two brands received the same email:
{{first_name}}, when you started {{company_name}} you probably talked to customers every week. How many this month?
The data: 40% of new products fail in year one. The fix is 50 customer conversations.
The problem: focus groups cost $10K and take weeks. Surveys don’t let you ask “why?” So most teams just guess based on sales data.
I built an AI interview agent for {{company_name}} - in a week, your team would know:
1. {{insight_1}}
2. {{insight_2}}
3. {{insight_3}}
Worth a look?
- Sravanthi
The offer beat the copy.
We invited prospects to a small event and shared a study topic drafted for their brand, with questions we could put to their customers. Both gave people a reason to reply.
{{first_name}} - we’re on the floor at {{conference}} today through close.
If you have a few minutes, I’d love to grab you between sessions and walk through the study we built for {{company_name}}.
A couple of the questions we pulled for it:
{{question_1}}
{{question_2}}
And final reminder for {{event}} before the show gets going - we leave tomorrow from the hotel lobby. Here’s a link to the invite.
Hope to see you there.
- Sravanthi
The rules we built it by.
- 01Moments beat listsThe person who ignored a cold pitch replies after a conference. Nothing about them changed. The timing did.
- 02Small and warm beats big and cold18 carefully chosen contacts outperformed 1,600 filtered ones.
- 03The offer matters more than the writingAn invitation to a small event gave prospects a reason to meet.
- 04Arrive with the work already doneEvery brand’s study topic was drafted before its first email. The outreach opened with something useful.